Two cases that Mueller appeared to subvert for political reasons while head of the FBI

Mueller's questionable activities go back a long way. As an honest Special Counsel, he is a joke. He is not only a political hack, but a dirty cop as well.
The following articles discuss:
the first his acrobatic cover-up in dealing with a Saudi  family's possible connection to 9/11
the second deals with the FBI and the Garland TX shooting

As FBI Director Mueller Helped Cover Up Fla. 9/11 Probe, Court Docs Show
JANUARY 23, 2018
Court documents recently filed by the government further rock the credibility of Russia Special Counsel Robert Mueller because they show that as FBI Director Mueller he worked to cover up the connection between a Florida Saudi family and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The documents reveal that Mueller was likely involved in publicly releasing deceptive official agency statements about a secret investigation of the Saudis, who lived in Sarasota, with ties to the hijackers. A Florida journalism nonprofit uncovered the existence of the secret FBI investigation that was also kept from Congress.


Under Mueller’s leadership, the FBI tried to discredit the story, publicly countering that agents found no connection between the Sarasota Saudi family and the 2001 terrorist plot. The reality is that the FBI’s own files contained several reports that said the opposite, according to the Ft. Lauderdale-based news group’s ongoing investigation. Files obtained by reporters in the course of their lengthy probe reveal that federal agents found “many connections” between the family and “individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” The FBI was forced to release the once-secret reports because the news group sued in federal court when the information wasn’t provided under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  much more at Judicial Watch


The following article contains a great deal of information and many links:
The FBI “Green-Lighted” the terror attack in Garland, TX, on May 3, 2015, alleges Bruce Joiner in his lawsuit against the United States of America.¹
No we didn’t, and even if we did, its our discretion based on policy (or no policy), defends the Federal Bureau of Investigation, through its mouthpiece, the Department of Justice.²
Dear readers, you are sworn-in as jurors,³ and must review the facts and law for your decision. This story is long, but worth your time. Rationales will be explained via pleadings’ quotes: Complaint [C ¶] or Memorandum [M pg.]. At this story’s end, you can click-on links to PDFs of pleadings.
The Case’s Essential Questions

1. But for the FBI’s undercover agent [UCE-1] having “volunteered” to facilitate a “protest” [a code], and enlisted Simpson and Soofi, would there have been an attack of bullets, resulting in the security officer [Joiner] having been shot in his leg, and his incurring Post Traumatic Stress Disorder?
2. Should Plaintiff [Joiner] get “$8 million in compensatory damages; Treble damages; [and] Any other relief the court deems appropriate”? [Complaint’s Prayer for Relief, pg. 38]⁴

Plaintiff’s Causes of Action   for more details go to The Geller Report

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.