The Realistic Observer

Sunday, January 15, 2017

Democrats Under Cover

Hypocrisy on steroids:  
In the past, when the Intelligence Agencies countered some Democrat claims, the Dems excoriated them. Now due to recent reports, true or untrue, which besmirch Trump's character, many in the party seem to be touting these bureaus as newly found best buddies.

Trump's issues with the CIA, FBI, etc. are one thing. However by inserting themselves full throttle into the issue, as usual, the wingnut Dems  made themselves look exactly like their party's symbol. They are a great disservice to the logical party members who truly understand what really happened in the 2016 presidential election. The Democrat Party had completely lost touch with the working and middle classes, and Hillary was a very flawed candidate. Period!

Presently,they would do best to be quiet, let the investigations play out, accept, with a modicum of decorum whatever conclusions result, and discourage violence as well as snowflake/buttercup behavior from the "traumatized" Hillary fans. Their present actions do not serve the party well.


Deep Cover Democrats

BY: Blake Seitz
January 13, 2017 12:20 pm

Ever since President-elect Donald Trump initiated his feud with the intelligence community, Democrats have discovered strange new respect for the nation’s spooks.

“They are now briefing the president elect, a person who has tried to discredit, disparage, and dismantle the existing intelligence community,” Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) said primly at a press conference.

The House Minority Leader struck a very different tone than she did in 2009, when she accused the CIA of intentionally “misleading” her with “inaccurate and incomplete information” about its interrogation techniques.

Likewise, Vice President Joe Biden called Trump’s criticism of the intelligence community “damaging”—but he was a famous antagonist of the CIA as a senator, voting to ban all covert operations during the height of the Cold War, a move that would have seriously endangered the United States in its spy war with the Soviet Union.

The Democrats’ sudden chumminess with the intelligence community is a big change after decades of lurid accusations and aggressive congressional oversight intended to tame the CIA and bring its covert activities into the light. Their battle for control over the agency lasted decades, from the Church Committee hearings of 1975, through the Latin American upheaval of the 1980s, to the interrogation and NSA surveillance debates of recent years. 

Alexander Carries On His Father's Work

Alexander Soros gave $4.5 million to Democratic campaigns and committees in 2016




George Soros has been married three times and divorced twice. He has three children by his first, and two by his second wife. Alexander Is from his second marriage.

In 1960 he married Annaliese Witschak. They divorced in 1983. They had three children:

In 1983, George Soros married Susan Weber, twenty-five years his junior. They divorced in 2005. They have two children:

Alexander Soros (born 1985): Alexander is also gaining prominence for his donations to social and political causes, focusing his philanthropic efforts on "progressive causes that might not have widespread support."[155] Alexander serves on the boards of Jewish Funds for Justice and Global Witness, and led the list of student political donors in the 2010 election cycle.[156]

Gregory James Soros (born 1988), artist

For a complete list of George Soros' marriages and children, as well as other family connections, go here.

Now, to Alexander:


Soros’ Son Quietly Steps Up as Major Liberal Donor

Alexander Soros gave $4.5 million to Democratic campaigns and committees in 2016

Alexander Soros, the son of liberal billionaire George Soros who acts as the managing partner for Soros Brothers Investments, has quietly emerged as a major donor to Democratic campaigns and causes.

Alexander has remained relatively unknown in the world of political giving thanks to his father garnering a bulk of the family’s attention. However, Alexander has stepped up his political contributions even as his father continued to pour tens of millions into the coffers of Democratic campaigns and political action committees.

Alexander gave more than $4.5 million to Democratic campaign committees and political action committees in 2016, according to campaign finance records. The millions in donations from Alexander throughout the past election cycle is a sharp increase from years past.

The Senate Majority PAC, the political action committee of former Sen. Harry Reid (D., Nev.), was the biggest recipient of cash from Soros’ son. Between August and November 2016, Alexander cut four checks to Reid’s leadership PAC totaling $3.5 million.

Alexander gave $127,800 to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee during the 2016 campaign cycle and added $133,400 to the Democratic National Committee Services Corp.

Alexander also contributed the maximum amount allowed ($5,400) to numerous Democratic politicians, including failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, former senator Russ Feingold (D., Wis.), Sen. Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.), and Rep. Keith Ellison, who is in the running to lead the Democratic National Committee.

Tens of thousands were also given to numerous state Democratic parties across the country. Alexander provided checks of $10,000 to the Democratic parties of Illinois, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Louisiana, Nevada, Texas, Oregon, Virginia, and Pennsylvania, among other states.

The $4.5 million in donations from Alexander this past election cycle is a major jump from what he had given since the 2012 election cycle.

Saturday, January 14, 2017

10 rules for radicals of the right


There has been an uprising of the citizenry and a reshaping of the body politic in the 2016 election. Whether the elites like it or not, they have only themselves to blame. They ignored the middle and working classes.

The electorate has been honing its battle axes for the past 8 years, and they are now becoming sharper. Talking points are becoming more effective and the truth can no longer be so easily hidden--despite the apparent crack down on free speech, a few examples of which can be found here, here and here.

The ranks against elitist and globalist domination are growing. There are a plethora of organizations that have been dealing with this situation since 2009. However the fight was severely hindered when, in the past, many were denied 501-3c status by the IRS which had become an obvious tool of the White House whose apparent objective seemed to be the trampling of the first amendment. There were even hearings on the matter which appeared to have gone nowhere, even though there was talk of impeaching the IRS head John Koskinen.

Nevertheless, the populists won in 2016 and the people now expect those in charge to deliver while they themselves deal with the everyday snowflakes, anarchists, and useful idiots of the left of whom they may run into daily.

Below are some interesting talking points, which many are probably already using. However, one may well find an unknown nugget or two to be added to the list.

"Paradoxically, populism is a movement of individualists whose common denominator is the U.S. Constitution. Unlike our cultural opponents who hold the hive-mind mentality of big-government statists, our true strength isn’t in our numbers, but the rightness of our cause."


10 rules for radicals of the right

author-image  by  Scott Lively  

In 1971 Marxist strategist Saul D. Alinsky published his infamous handbook for “community organizers,” titled “Rules for Radicals,” which ever since has been the essential resource for left-wing agitators, including the Clintons and Obama.

Alinsky dedicated his “Rules for Radicals” to “the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer” [the entity also known as Satan, the Father of Lies and Enslaver of Mankind].

As we conservative populists begin to reclaim our nation from Alinsky’s anti-American Bolsheviks, we need a resource for pro-American constitutionalists. These Rules for Radicals of the Right are dedicated to the One who conquered Lucifer:

1. Tell the truth without hesitation or apology.
Truth is our most powerful weapon and strategy. Truth is objective, verifiable and self-evident to a clear-thinking mind grounded in rationality and knowledge of the facts. Rationality proceeds from recognition and respect for the created order and the Creator Himself. His immutable laws provide the fixed standards by which any material or spiritual thing can be measured, proved and trusted. Without fixed standards there can be no steadfast rule of law making all men equal and free, only arbitrary rule by those with power to enforce their will.

2. Keep it simple but not stupid.
The enemy relies on confusion to create chaos and then exploits it to take control. He weaves a complex fabric of falsehoods, half-truths, misrepresentations, misdirection, hidden false assumptions and sophistry designed to mislead the gullible into drawing false conclusions. Complexity favors the deceivers. Honest and intelligent simplification frees captive minds.

3. Trust or not trust, but always verify.
People who spin narratives or otherwise interpret facts or events instead of providing the straight facts to interpret for yourself often have their own agenda. This includes not just leftist media but can be any information source, including those you think are trustworthy. Whenever you’re expected to form a conclusion on any issue based on the authority of the source rather than the full and free presentation of the facts, including opposing opinions and interpretations, don’t trust it. This is especially true when an inherently controversial narrative is repeated consistently over time from only one perspective, such as “climate change,” the “born gay” assumption, or the theory of evolution.

4. Think for yourself.
Human beings are susceptible to jumping on bandwagons or joining teams to meet social needs, but this makes us vulnerable to manipulation by people who form or control teams to serve their own agenda (i.e, the R’s and D’s). Beware of any group, system or institution that requires or expects you to substitute their conclusions for your own, or to adopt a “team” position on a whole slate of issues, and shuns or denigrates you for disagreeing on one or more items. (E.g., many liberals recognize an essential natural order in the eco-systems of living things but are forbidden from acknowledging the natural family as humanity’s ecosystem because “gay rights” is a “must-embrace” leftist goal.)

5. See the good and bad on both sides.
Remember that the devil works both sides of the street, and it serves his goals if we evaluate people by the team they’re on, not their character or the rationality of their arguments. If truth is our standard and filter, we’ll judge things and people fairly and thereby lessen the “us vs. them” stupidity that makes us so easy to manipulate in elections and other cultural conflicts.

Friday, January 13, 2017

The enemy within remains vigilant



The enemies of freedom never sleep. Much has been written about the clash between freedom and oppression throughout human history. Go here for an extensive list.

Totalitarians have always come in many stripes and spouted many different ideologies, but the endgame was and remains the same--complete control of the populace so as to further their own agenda.


Unfortunately, all too many are seduced by the siren song of a perfect world and eagerly follow those who promise such. Some are true believers, others are disgruntled with the status quo, others are anarchists, who prefer chaos, and others are non ideological but simply bored or lawless.

Throughout human history, there have many many different supporters of both freedom and oppression. Excerpts from the following discuss a well known funder of present day oppression--ole George.

The Devil Behind the Democrats details ole George's influence in several areas. It is lengthy but well worth the read.

Soros has such a wide web of organizations all working in tandem to drive his message, some which will surprise many Republicans. Tax records of the Soros funded group, Open Society, shows that Soros gave 33 million dollars in funding that kept the Ferguson riots going among other civil disobedience the group has funded. Soros has used Open Society much as he has MoveOn.org to support Black Lives Matter protests as well. These incidents, whether in Staten Island, Cleveland or Ferguson, or a Donald Trump political rally are not spontaneous protests. They are well planned and well-funded. Soros used his other groups to fund scholarly works blaming conservatives for the actions as well as decimating that same information through his bought and paid for media campaigns of MoveOn.org and Think Progress. He also feeds that information to like-minded news organizations like PMSDNC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC and the New York Times.

His goal: Increase U.S. electorate by 10 million voters before 2018 off-year elections by hook or crook--mostly crook. Details here


This Is Why We Should Fear George Soros, Not The Koch Brothers  A bit of truth.

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

A Dangerous Crisis In Confidence



Americans have lost all trust in the government as well as in the MSM
The perceived politicization of our Intelligence Agencies has led to a distrust of them as well as of the government and of the Soros owned MSM in general.  The entire debacle of rumors, accusations, and outright declarations sans evidence has not served this nation well.

This distrust is also very dangerous to our national security. If we cannot put faith in the very people whose job it is to be our watchdogs against threats to our national security, we are standing naked in the wind.


During  the Bush administration, many did not believe, rightly or wrongly, the justifications for the war in Iraq and felt it was strictly for the oil. During the Obama administration, it became blatantly obvious that the MSM was behind him all of the way no matter of his egregious dictatorial executive fiats issued in order to bypass Congress.  During the 2016 primaries and the election, the media was cheering leading for Hillary and ignoring the ramifications and fallout from her mishandling of classified information on her private server and of the questionable ethics of the Clinton Foundation.

Discerning the truth in any of the above was nearly impossible.

Nevertheless, Hillary lost the election. Rather than examine exactly what happened and where they went wrong, Hillary supporters and the Democrats have engaged in a blame game that far exceeds in length and vitriol that of any previous post election analysis by the losing party.

Unfortunately, due to their perceived politicization, the intelligence agencies have now been thrown into a "Basket Of Prevaricators" by the general public. This development is very unfortunate for the truly dedicated men and women who serve in them and are distressed by how their agency heads have appeared to capitulate to politics.

Reports with no true substance have been released blaming the Russians for tampering with the election; thus, implying that Trump is not a legitimately elected president.

The fallout from these events are dangerous to our national security.  If America cannot trust the watchdogs against portentous developments to our safety, it is defenseless against any real threats that could lead to tragedy.

Perhaps that is the goal of the elites who are very much threatened by a Trump presidency?

The following post discusses in detail the holes in the official reports.

U.S. Intelligence Agencies Have No Clothes




by Tyler Durden 

The true patriotism, the only rational patriotism is loyalty to the nation all the time, loyalty to the government when it deserves it.

– Mark Twain, The Czar’s Soliloquy”
At this point, pretty much everyone in America has seen the results of Hillary Clinton media pet, John Harwood’s recent Twitter poll.
The significance of the above cannot be overstated. U.S. intelligence agencies, like so many other national institutions, have lost nearly all credibility in the eyes of the American public. The list is long, but includes economists, politicians, the mainstream media, central bankers, the financial system, and a lot more. The loss in credibility is well deserved and has nothing to do with Russia. Rather, it’s a function of a disastrous 21st century outcome for U.S. citizens both at home and abroad. A result that was achieved under eight years of Republican rule and then eight years of Democratic rule. The results were the same whether a donkey or elephant was in charge, because the people determining policy behind the scenes never really changed (same economists, central bankers, intelligence officials, etc), and the people selling the catastrophic policies to the public definitely never changes (mainstream media and its worthless pundits).

So here we stand at a moment where trust in essentially all U.S. institutions is at a well deserved all-time low, and the best the establishment can come up with is to blame Russia. Even worse, those pushing the whole “Putin is to blame for everything” conspiracy theories, consistently refuse to back up their assertions with any evidence whatsoever. In fact, with each passing week the case looks increasingly flimsy, with the latest declassified document issued Friday being particularly suspect. Even many of those largely convinced of Russia’s meddling in the U.S. election admit the most recent report was pathetic, embarrassing and proved absolutely nothing.

Robert Parry of Consortium News summarizes the farce perfectly in his recent piece U.S. Report Still Lacks Proof on Russia ‘Hack’. Here’s how he begins the article:
Repeating an accusation over and over again is not evidence that the accused is guilty, no matter how much “confidence” the accuser asserts about the conclusion. Nor is it evidence just to suggest that someone has a motive for doing something. Many conspiracy theories are built on the notion of “cui bono” – who benefits – without following up the supposed motive with facts.

But that is essentially what the U.S. intelligence community has done regarding the dangerous accusation that Russian President Vladimir Putin orchestrated a covert information campaign to influence the outcome of the Nov. 8 U.S. presidential election in favor of Republican Donald Trump.

Just a day after Director of National Intelligence James Clapper vowed to go to the greatest possible lengths to supply the public with the evidence behind the accusations, his office released a 25-page report that contained no direct evidence that Russia delivered hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta to WikiLeaks.

The DNI report amounted to a compendium of reasons to suspect that Russia was the source of the information – built largely on the argument that Russia had a motive for doing so because of its disdain for Democratic nominee Clinton and the potential for friendlier relations with Republican nominee Trump.

But the report’s assessment is more than just a reasonable judgment based on a body of incomplete information. It is tendentious in that it only lays out the case for believing in Russia’s guilt, not reasons for doubting that guilt.

For instance, while it is true that many Russian officials, including President Putin, considered Clinton to be a threat to worsen the already frayed relationship between the two nuclear superpowers, the report ignores the downside for Russia trying to interfere with the U.S. election campaign and then failing to stop Clinton, which looked like the most likely outcome until Election Night.

If Russia had accessed the DNC and Podesta emails and slipped them to WikiLeaks for publication, Putin would have to think that the National Security Agency, with its exceptional ability to track electronic communications around the world, might well have detected the maneuver and would have informed Clinton.

So, on top of Clinton’s well-known hawkishness, Putin would have risked handing the expected incoming president a personal reason to take revenge on him and his country. Historically, Russia has been very circumspect in such situations, usually holding its intelligence collections for internal purposes only, not sharing them with the public.

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

The Soft Coup Collapses


Regarding the 2016 defeat of Hillary's presidential aspirations, many have not bought into  "The Russians Did It" meme despite the denials of Julian Assange and of course, the Russians themselves. One could be forgiven for not necessarily believing either of them; however, the one undeniable fact is that Hillary was a very flawed candidate and the Democrat party is corrupt and out of touch with those whom it purports to serve--the working class.

The following post sheds some interesting light on the entire process, and contains many links.

 One may find some of the assertions somewhat unbelievable. Nevertheless, they are worth considering  even if the reader disagrees with some of them.

CIA Bluffing, Russia Did Not Hack, Blackmail Revealed – What Next?

Denial Of Reality Or Complicity?

 

On the face of it, the denial of Islamic terrorist acts and the presence of jihadis on American soil appears to be either stupid or insane. Is it? 

Every attack by a so-called lone wolf is said to be anything but Islamic related. After 9/11, our intelligence agencies both foreign and domestic were excoriated for not "connecting the dots", not sharing information with each other, and utterly lacking the ability to foresee such an event. 

After the creation of the DHS such interactions improved.  Did that help? Yes up  to a point. We have not had another 9/11 type event on American soil. Enter  the Orwellian meme regarding "The Religion Of Peace", charges of racism, and Islamophobia became the trendy narrative of the complicit and the clueless. 

What happened? Was there a fear of backlash against peaceful Muslims living in America?  Did such Muslims rise up in unison and denounce the acts of those who "hi-jacked" their religion? Did powerful Muslims groups work behind the scenes to infiltrate the government until by the end of Obama's first term, DC was a de facto arm of the MB?

Just who does this administration answer to? The American people, or to the elites and their agenda. 

The following post from The Conservative Review raises some cogent points on the issue.


Obama and AG Lynch have created a safe space for jihadis to operate in America 

Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s latest “interfaith” outreach effort is a shining example of the alternative universe the progressives inhabit, with grave consequences for our nation.

To hear her tell it during an address delivered on December 12 at the All Dulles Area Muslim Society (ADAMS) Center, America is in the throes of a dangerous anti-Islamic wave that threatens to tear the nation apart. Prefacing her remarks by noting that the present “has been a difficult time for many Muslim Americans,” Lynch delivered a speech, hewing perfectly to the Obama administration narrative on Islam.

She asserted that in the march toward perfecting an imperfect union, America still had its shortcomings, with 2015 FBI hate crime statistics showing “perhaps most troublingly of all … a 67 percent increase in hate crimes committed against Muslim Americans, and the highest total of anti-Muslim incidents since 2001, when 9/11 spurred so many reprehensible acts.”

Per usual, AG Lynch failed to note that despite this relatively drastic increase, anti-Islamic crimes accounted for 21.9 percent of the 1,402 victims of all anti-religious hate crimes — that is, just over 300 people in a country of more than 300 million. Anti-Jewish hate crimes meanwhile accounted for the majority of all anti-religious hate crimes at 52.1 percent.

The Obama administration has never made an issue of the anti-Jewish hate crimes, mind you, nor has it acknowledged just how tolerant and peaceful our nation actually is: 1,402 victims of hate crimes in a nation of more than 300 million people is a very welcome rounding error reflective of the goodness of our people.

Threatening electors violates federal law. So why isn’t Loretta Lynch doing anything about it?

Lynch noted the “flurry of recent news reports about alleged hate crimes and harassment — from hijabs yanked off of women’s heads to swastikas sprayed on the sides of synagogues to slurs and epithets hurled in classrooms,” reassuring the audience that the FBI was on the case. She ignored that in the supposed post-Trump conflagration of hate, many of these incidents have been proven to be hoaxes. There is a history of those on the Left in particular pushing a narrative about Islamophobic hate crimes, which frequently turn out to be fabrications, as CR’s own Michelle Malkin has illustrated.

[Author's note: Coincidentally, just after this story was published, one of the more egregious and widely reported such stories of a supposedly Trump-inspired anti-Islamic attack was found to be a hoax.]

None of this is to downplay Lynch’s remarks, but it’s necessary to add the context she quite tellingly left out. Such omissions show where Lynch’s priorities stand: focusing on the supposed anti-Islamic behavior of Americans over all else, including the metastasization of Islamic supremacism — as represented for example, in the ISIS investigations her FBI was conducting in all 50 states — which threatens us all.

Or are jihadist attacks not hateful and intended to undermine our fundamental rights too? Never does the Obama administration present evidence that Muslims are being killed in hate crimes in numbers anywhere near the victims of jihadist attacks in our country. Nor of course does AG Lynch talk about more taboo subjects like female genital mutilation or honor killings (which occur disproportionately in the Muslim community), the latter which yield an estimated 23-27 victims per year, more than the 18 individuals murdered in all hate crimes in 2015.

Let me restate that: There are more estimated honor killings than hate crime murders per year in America.

Next, Lynch suggested that Muslim Americans were being “targeted and demonized simply because of their faith … due to the actions of those who pervert” Islam. On what authority does Lynch get to determine what constitutes “perverting Islam?” To the best of our knowledge, she is not an expert in Islamic jurisprudence. Far more important, if jihadists say that they are acting on behalf of Allah and can cite chapter and verse in Islamic law backing their cause, does it matter what Lynch thinks represents true Islam?

The end of the Obama administration cannot come soon enough. Undoing its damage will require a sea change that begins with turning the progressive-Islamist narrative on its head.

During her address, Lynch went on to speak about the importance of protecting the rights of the LGBTQ community (rights not recognized under Islamic law), the importance of preserving the Bill of Rights and freedom generally (yet hinting she might prosecute Americans over “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric”), and the parallels between the plight of Muslims and that of slaves and other discriminated groups (in spite of the apartheid nature of the Sharia-based Islamic world under which minorities are subjugated, and slavery itself literally still exists).

It should be noted that Lynch took the stage to speak about the importance of our shared American ideals — freedom, equality and tolerance — following a welcome from Imam Mohamed Magid, the executive director of the ADAMS Center.

Imam Magid happens to be the former president of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), an organization founded by Muslim Brotherhood members and classified by federal prosecutors as being among the “individuals/entities who are and/or were members of the US Muslim Brotherhood” during the Holy Land Foundation jihadist financing case that concluded in 2008. This was the largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history over a criminal conspiracy that resulted in the funneling of $12 million to Hamas. In particular, the government showed ISNA associated not only with the Holy Land Foundation, but also the Islamic Association for Palestine and Hamas.

One would think the nation’s chief law enforcement officer might see the irony in speaking at an Islamic center led by an imam who presided over a Muslim Brotherhood-tied organization, given that the Brotherhood seeks to supplant our system based in individual liberty and the separation of church and state with one based in the totalitarian tenets of Sharia in which mosque and state are one.

But alas, it is clear that Lynch has no such concern. For Magid is a longtime partner of the Obama administration who worked on the Countering Violent Extremism paradigm, which as we have chronicled elsewhere, has served chiefly to create a safe space for jihadis to operate — to our great detriment.

The end of the Obama administration cannot come soon enough. Undoing its damage will require a sea change that begins with turning the progressive-Islamist narrative on its head.


Go here to the original posts and to see a short video by Michelle Malkin


Source:  The Conservative Review

Knowledge is power. The Realistic Observer is a non-partisan, non-profit blog dedicated to keeping our readers as informed as possible.

Monday, January 9, 2017

Obama And His Forthcoming "Shadow Government"

I had included this issue in a previous post Warning! America Do Not Rest, The Enemy Within Continues Its Mission. as one of the various fronts in the post election war to continue the "Agenda" and who the funders were.

Perhaps Obama told Hillary to concede on election night because he was not really very concerned over both her and the Democrat Party's loss.
His post election agenda will continue with powerful backers and many followers. It will be a fifth column bent on destroying America and planning to serve it up to the elitists who seek ultimate power over Planet Earth.

I also posted on the threat to Trump from the globalist agenda. Obama is their American General funded by the primary CFO Soros.


From Zero Hedge Fund:
Basically, Trump Can't Stop It: "The People Who Have Been Orchestrating The Collapse Have Not Halted Their Agendas"
There are some very somber, pragmatic articles circulating as of late that present a true snapshot of the difficulties the U.S. faces after eight years of Obama. One of these articles is a well-written, thought-provoking piece by Susan Duclos of All News Pipeline, entitled We are Facing the Most Important Battle of All at the Most Dangerous Moment in History. The piece shows what we’re up against and cautions all of us not to rely on the “magic fix” of Trump’s victory to side rail our preparations and vigilance. Here is an excerpt from that excellent article:

“We at ANP are noting a lot of optimism from investors with stocks soaring, to economic confidence reaching new highs, to small business owners, to household spending and even prepping has hit a “multi-year low,” all the articles I am reading are crediting the election of Donald Trump as reason for all this optimism, but as much as I hate to rain on everyone’s parade… now is the most dangerous time in history, not a time to assume just because one man was elected, all the wrongs will be made right, the failing economy will automatically just magically fix itself.”

Susan deserves special thanks, as well as Stefan Stanford; their coverage of developments has been spot-on and unwavering in their attempts to present objective and factual reporting, while warning readers akin to modern Paul Reveres that the battle is not over by any means. In reality, it is not even close to being over. I recommend reading the article’s section toward the beginning under “THE ECONOMY IS COLLAPSING” paragraph introduction for statistics on where we stand economically at this moment in time.

There was a piece released by Michael Snyder of the Economic Collapse Blog on December 8th entitled It is Like a Nuclear Bomb Went Off in the Prepping Community, another timely piece that warns of the complacency settling in now that most conservatives believe that Trump will be the vaccine for the country’s illnesses. Here is an excerpt from that article: continue
America has always had its enemies, but the internal dangers ramped up after WWII. Much has been written about such infiltration. Communism, Globalism, and Islam all have arms within America and are in many cases coalescing toward their ultimate objective. 

Sunday, January 8, 2017

James O'Keefe: The Mainstream Media Is Dead. We Won.

It was not just the Russians, Wikileaks, or disgusted DNC insiders who discredited the Clinton machine and the MSM. This man is a true warrior for the truth.

In case you missed this: 


Transcript from a video accessible at the end of this post.


Project Veritas President recounts his fight against the Clinton machine and its media enablers.

James O'Keefe: Thank you very much. I only have about 10 to 15 minutes before I go to lunch, but I wanted to say a few words.  I was invited here at the last minute.  My friend, Jim Young here, invited me, and thanks for having me.  I want to say a few words and show just a very few clips from Project Veritas.  I wanted to say that we did it, and the media in this country, as Bill Little said last night, is now discredited.  It's dead and we have killed it and it's been a long time coming because they put us through so much over the last 10 years:  Planned Parenthood, civil lawsuits, jail, defamation, lies, slander and now we've won.

I'm going to walk you through very quickly just some of what I think are the poignant historical moments.  It all started 4 weeks ago when Twitter kicked me off.  I was kicked off Twitter for releasing the videos, and out of nowhere thousands of people sent messages to the CEO of Twitter.  Thousands of people sent messages to Jack Dorsey and they reinstated my account 36 hours later, and when they did we had 40,000 new followers.

I met Donald Trump two years ago.  I did a story at Cornell.  We went into Cornell and we said we were an ISIS club, and we wanted to get money from Cornell to do it, and we released this video on Cornell giving day, the day when all the alumni are supposed to give money to Cornell.  We had alumni stop giving to Cornell and started giving money to Project Veritas. I got an email from New York from the Trump Tower that said Donald Trump would like to meet you. This was two years ago. And he printed out this video and said that that's Donald Trump's signature.  James Graywork, as always "Best wishes, Donald Trump."  Donald Trump was always a fan, but this is well before he ran for president.  Fast forward two years and we release the first video.

[Video Clip of Scott Foval, former Americans United for Change Field Director:]
Scott Foval: If you're there and you're protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked at Trump rallies. The whole point of this is we know that Trump's people will freak the f--- out, the security team will freak out and his supporters will lose their s---.

James O'Keefe: So it turns out, sorry for the language, but this is your taxpayer dollars hard at work.  So these people were doing these awful, immoral things, illegal things and they were working directly with and for the DNC, paid by Hillary Clinton to do them.  We released video after video.
[Video Clip of Scott Foval:]

Scott Foval: We did it to them when we were in charge too.  What'd we do?  We did the exact same thing.  We manipulated the vote with money and action, not with laws.  It's a very easy thing for a Republican to say, "Well, they're bussing people in."  Well, you know what? We've been bussing people in to deal with you f------ a------ for 50 years and we're not going to stop now.  We're just going find a different way to do it.  So, I mean I grew up with that idea.  They used to bus people out to Iowa.

James O'Keefe: Finally we had people actually admitting what actually happens behind closed doors.  This took us a year.  We had eight people imbedded full time in the Hillary Clinton campaign for 1 year.  We had to set up elaborate aliases.  We created an offshore account and wire transferred $20,000.00 in real money to this guy.  We had exotic sports cars. We had private planes that were lended to me so that I could convince these guys that we were big money people, and finally, we got them to confess that it was in fact Hillary Clinton's idea to dress people up in these ridiculous costumes to get punched in the face.


[Video Clip of Robert Creamer, Founder of Democracy Partners]:
Robert Creamer: In the end it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground.  Well, by God we will give ducks on the ground. Don't repeat that to anybody.

James O'Keefe: Yeah, don't repeat that to anybody.  Just say it right into my microphone.  Could you just say that the way you just said it right into my button camera?

That man is not some low-level guy, some ACORN employee.  That man is married to a United States congresswoman, is best friends with Obama, was a community organizer with Obama, and resigned right after this video came out.  These videos were the No. 1 trending video -- that's a beautiful sight to behold -- in the world.  
The No. 1 trending video on YouTube. 

Saturday, January 7, 2017

Apocalypse Now: Europe On The Edge Of Defeat, America Next



This is a repost of an essay I had written in October, 2015. Do we now have a chance to   escape this, or are we too far down the road.

There is a massive invasion of the West that is resulting in cultural destruction, not by fire power but by sheer numbers. Did we all not see this coming? For the past several decades many in all walks of life have been aware, but their voices have been ignored.

What is happening now reminds me of a prescient article I read in The Atlantic in the early 90s entitled Must It Be the Rest Against the West? The nationalities involved as well as the drivers of their massive exodus from their countries of origin are different. However, the underlying dynamics and consequences are the same, overwhelming numbers of refugees and the inadequate response of the nations being literally invaded.

The article is quite long and asks many pertinent questions. It offers some Agenda 21 type solutions as well as others of a different nature. The point is that this article was written in 1994, and opens with a discussion oThe Camp of the Saints by Jean Raspail published in 1973, which is an apocalyptic novel that depicts a setting wherein Third World mass immigration to France and the West leads to the destruction of Western civilization. Almost forty years after publication the book returned to the bestseller list in 2011.[1] The title is a reference to the Book of Revelation (Rev 20:9).


Our Social Institutions have now been successfully weakened by our enemies within to the point where the demise of America is all but assured. Our treacherous leaders, both political and "spiritual" now have in their hands the ability to wield the Sword of Islam toward its ultimate goal, the pounding down of the West to insure its subservience to the Globalist agenda.

The Washington D.C. created Hell On Earth in the Middle East has achieved the ultimate Islamofascist goal of "transforming"  the western world via conquest by migration.  The concept of Hijrah-Immigration- is a means of overtaking the native population. The attainment of political/cultural dominance is a well-developed doctrine in Islam. 

And the "Powers That Be" never saw this coming? Bovine Scatology!



Dhimmitude On Steroids:
European Leftists Want Confiscation Of Private Property To House Immigrants. Yes, you read that correctly....one of Sweden's largest dailies, urged Swedes to "make way" and "hand over the keys to their apartments to those in greater need."

It's gone further than that in Germany where the mayor of at least one small town has discussed forcing residents to give up property to refugees, and there have been reports, since denied, that the German government wanted to force rentals.
Swedes' Homes May Be Confiscated to Accommodate Asylum Seekers

Again, in 1992:
The "Threat and Risk Assessment Commission" established that the government should have the option to seize property, especially summer homes, from the Swedish people in a time of crisis.

Thursday, January 5, 2017

Official Prevarication: Two Outstanding Examples

Have we reached the point where we can believe nothing from the "Powers that Be" and the MSM?

The present environment is akin to "Animal Farm" on steroids

Our leaders have always miss led us to some extent for various reasons. However, we have now been pitched full throttle into the era of "News Speak" and "Double Think".

The following two posts discuss the subject with examples from both areas.

First Example, One From The Powers That Be:


Two Months After Election, FBI Admits They Never Looked At DNC Email Servers
There seems to be nothing the Democrats won’t attribute to Russian hackers supposedly interfering with the 2016 Presidential election. They want to find excuses to explain Hillary Clinton’s historic lost to President elect Donald Trump, and the media is helping them make up stories.

Now, the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) has made a shocking announcement about their investigations into those same DNC email servers, which caused so many problems for Team Clinton. The FBI now admits they never looked at the server before placing blame on Russia!
The FBI didn’t bother to conduct a forensic analysis of the servers. Wow!
The FBI did not examine the servers of the Democratic National Committee before issuing a report attributing the sweeping cyberintrusion to Russia-backed hackers, BuzzFeed News has learned.
Six months after the FBI first said it was investigating the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s computer network, the bureau has still not requested access to the hacked servers, a DNC spokesman said. No US government entity has run an independent forensic analysis on the system, one US intelligence official told BuzzFeed News.
“The DNC had several meetings with representatives of the FBI’s Cyber Division and its Washington (DC) Field Office, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, and U.S. Attorney’s Offices, and it responded to a variety of requests for cooperation, but the FBI never requested access to the DNC’s computer servers,” Eric Walker, the DNC’s deputy communications director, told BuzzFeed News in an email.
This suggests the FBI and the Obama administration already came to the conclusion that Russia was behind the hacking (or phishing) long before evidence was examined.
The FBI has a massive budget for investigations and is the most sophisticated investigative agency on Earth. With world-class forensic talents and the best technology in their crime labs, the FBI decided to outsource this critical investigation. And to make matters worse, the 3rd party investigators were charged with coming up with their own conclusions!
The political narrative of these servers is a mess. This story was broken by Buzzfeed, a liberal site, which is a sign that even liberals aren’t buying the Obama administration’s story of how the 2016 election was lost.
Trump won fairly, and there’s no doubt that any excuse-making about emails is a way to undermine Trump and the millions of Americans who proudly voted for him. 


And Of Course, The Beloved MSM:

Ten basic forms of fake news used by major media

Wednesday, January 4, 2017

Pertinent Information Regarding Stealth Jihad



This post is more or less a compendium of links and excerpts detailing the entire subject of stealth Jihad and its progress in the U.S.

Unlike the violent attacks of the militant Islamists, stealth jihad is just that, a stealthy penetration of all of our social institutions.

Under the aegis of the present administration, not only has this been allowed, but encouraged and protected. Those who are concerned are, sigh, labeled Islamophobes. No discussion/disagreement allowed. Of course the Soros controlled MSM leads the way on this road of suicidal denial.


There is a great deal of information from the sites below which the MSM has deliberatly failed to convey. 


Discover The Networks: Stealth Jihad
 Terrorist attacks that involve bombings and shootings are just one component of the jihad, or holy war, that Islamists are actively waging against infidels all over the world. Another component of that jihad consists of nonviolent initiatives which can be classified as stealth (or "soft”) jihad, whose goal is the imposition of Islamic law, Sharia, over every region of the earth by non-confrontational means. Under the banners of "tolerance" and "civil rights," stealth jihadists introduce, in piecemeal fashion, elements of Sharia into Western societies and then demand that non-Muslims make allowance for those elements. Moreover, stealth jihadists smear those who dare to discuss the negative aspects of Sharia (and Islam) as "racists" and "Islamophobes."  continue


Some examples of how stealth jihad has made inroads into U.S. and Western culture include the following:

 Frontpage Mag: The War Against Stealth Jihad
The term “stealth jihad” is a bit misleading. The stealth jihad groups may be stealthy, but they don’t operate underground. They have offices, spokesmen, PR people, legal teams, and impressive websites. They present themselves as moderate mainstream groups, and for the most part the media and administration officials accept them as such.

How do they operate? In general, they advertise themselves as civil rights advocates working to protect the rights of the “Muslim community.” Using the cover of civil rights activism, the stealth jihadists have been able to score some spectacular successes. In 2012, for example, more than 1,000 documents and presentations were purged from counterterror training programs for the FBI and other security agencies. This was done in response to pressure from Islamic advocacy groups who complained that the training policies were biased and offensive to Muslims. In effect, these Muslim Brotherhood-linked groups were given veto power over national security policy, and, as a result, investigative agencies were forced to limit themselves to politically correct policing.

America’s commitment to the dogma of political correctness is, in fact, the chief factor that accounts for the success of stealth jihad. The stealth jihadists are well-versed in the rules of political correctness, and they know how to use them to their own advantage. And if they can bend the federal government to their will by using these methods, they can certainly do the same to average citizens.
continue

Americans warned: Invisible jihad occurring under our noses

Leftist Feminists: WAKE UP!

 
Aziza Sayah (left) and Nadia Remadna (right) are activists from the "Brigade of Mothers" women's rights group in France, who recently went with concealed cameras into a café in a Paris suburb, where they were met with surprise and hostility from the all-male customers. (Image source: France 2 video screenshot)

Sharia Supporting Feminists: 

Unfortunately, most Islamists regard all non-Muslim women as whores to be raped unless they stay out of sight. Don't you get it? 

Islamist extremists are using Sharia to justify their sub-human savagery towards the treatment of women, their own included. In Muslim dominated countries, gang rape, honor killings, and stoning of women, (often on false charges) are all too familiar in the alternative news media and blogs. 

Migrants are bringing these 7th century beliefs with them where ever they go. Here and Here are but two of a plethora of links dealing with the mass raping of European women by "refugees".

Here is an occurrence of a migrant raping an American woman and there are many more instances which have been covered up.

Bring sharia to America and your fate as a kefir object deserving of rape will be sealed.

The following post which deals with the changing fate of women in France is but an example of the fate of European women in general where ever there are overwhelming numbers of so called refugees. 

 Do you want this here?

Europe: The Case of the Vanishing Women

  • "It is best to wait outside. There are men in here... In this café, there is no diversity." — Male customer in a café in Sevran, on France 2 television.
  • "In this café, there is no mixing. We are in Sevran, not Paris. Here there is a different mentality. It is like back home." ­ — Another male customer in a café in Sevran, on France 2 television.
  • Women seem "to have been erased", from the cafés and the streets. "So now to avoid threats, and being put under pressure, they censor themselves and keep quiet." — Caroline Sinz, journalist, France 2 television.
  • This Islamization has been fueled and strengthened by Qatar's heavy investments -- particularly in mosques -- in France, which currently stand at around $22 billion.
  • "There is a misplaced form of morality, often exercised by minority groups over a majority, which leads to the fact that the public space, supposedly belonging to both men and women, is restricted from women." — Pascale Boistard, former French Minister for Women's Rights
  • French ministers feign surprise and outrage that women in these suburbs have finally succumbed to the incessant terror against them and are disappearing from the streets.
Women have literally disappeared from cafés and bars in certain predominantly Muslim suburbs in France, according to recently aired undercover footage from the France 2 television channel. The footage featured two women activists, Nadia Remadna and Aziza Sayah, from the women's rights campaign group, La Brigade des Mères (Brigade of Mothers), entering a café in the Paris suburb of Sevran, where they were met with surprise and hostility from the all-male customers. One told them: "It is best to wait outside. There are men in here... In this café, there is no diversity."

Another customer told them: "In this café, there is no mixing. We are in Sevran, not Paris. Here there is a different mentality. It is like back home."

In a suburb of Lyon, France 2 TV journalist Caroline Sinz spoke to a young woman who said that she is quite simply afraid to go out, and wears baggy clothes and no makeup to avoid being targeted by the Muslim men in the neighborhood.

In the words of Sinz, women seem "to have been erased," from the cafés and the streets. Sinz goes on to explain that women in these areas used to protest against the status quo, but now,
"They are afraid, they have already spoken out in many cities, and were insulted and assaulted... So now to avoid threats, and being put under pressure, they censor themselves and keep quiet."
Axelle Lemaire, France's Minister for Digital Affairs, and the first government official to comment on the footage, said the footage appeared to show an "intolerable" and "illegal" case of "discrimination against women". However, she was quick to add that it was not a question of religion, and said that France's Muslim communities should not be blamed.

Lemaire's comment about religion reveals, once more, the willful ignorance that so many in Europe's political establishment display in their refusal to deal with the issues of Islamization. Sevran is part of the district of Seine-Saint-Denis, an area inhabited by over 600,000 Muslims, out of 1.4 million people. Already in 2011, a report by the highly respected political scientist and expert on Islam, Gilles Kepel, "Banlieue de la République" ("Suburb of the Republic"), showed that Seine-Saint-Denis, as well as other suburbs, were becoming parallel Islamic societies, increasingly cut off from the rest of French society. That women have now disappeared from the streets of Sevran cannot be divorced from the fact of the Islamization of these societies.