The Realistic Observer

The Realistic Observer

Seeking The Truth

Sunday, July 23, 2017

Demand for a Ministry of Truth from the NYT?

Or, as the narrator puts it, he's "a brilliant talker, and when he was arguing some difficult point he had a way of skipping from side to side and whisking his tail which was somehow very persuasive. The others said of Squealer that he could turn black into white" (2.2). He's the one-pig PR outfit of Napoleon's regime, with a quick mind, nimble tongue, and absolutely no morals whatsoever.

Do the characteristics of the above minister of truth remind the reader of anyone or any organization in particular?
No two ways about it, the leftist idea of a "utopia" is a place called Animal Farm where all are created equal, but some are more equal than others.
And now the New York Times is calling for a de facto Ministry Of Truth to muzzle Conservative speakers on the basis that they incite hate. Conservatives and their thoughts must be banned because they are a threat to freedom of speech. All speech and thoughts must now support the narrative in order to be heard.
The entire concept leaves rational thinking people wondering if they have gone through the looking glass or stumbled into an alternative Orwellian universe.
The following perversity must be challenged, lest we fall into the abyss of a dystopian world of newsspeak, groupthink, and doublethink.

New York Times Makes Stunning Call for Conservative Censorship 07/18/2017 / By admin
Psychology Professor Lisa Feldman Barrett had a question for New York Times readers on Sunday, and you can probably already imagine what her answer was, given the outlet. “When is Speech Violence?” Barrett asked, and her answer was that it is essentially a form of violence when words have a deteriorating effect on a person’s health and their way of life. As you might have guessed, she concludes that such effects are manifest in the speeches given by controversial conservative speakers – many of whom have been banned from college campuses in recent months.

“That’s why it’s reasonable, scientifically speaking, not to allow a provocateur and hatemonger like Milo Yiannopoulos to speak at your school,” she writes. “He is part of something noxious, a campaign of abuse. There is nothing to be gained from debating him, for debate is not what he is offering.”

Scientifically speaking! Which means that Barrett searched high and low to find studies that prove that speech can have an effect on the mental and physical health of minorities, perhaps overlooking that this can only be true when said minorities ALLOW it to have such an effect. And certainly overlooking the fact that there is no study on the planet that proves that the specific speeches of Milo Yiannopoulos or Ann Coulter have ever shortened the lives of any of their listeners. Although this may become true in time – not because of their words, but because the country is waiting breathlessly for movements like AntiFa to move past lighting campuses on fire and onto simply shooting those with whom they disagree. The ones who die are unlikely to be the fragile minorities Barrett is so desperate to protect, of course.

Saturday, July 22, 2017

The cat Is out of the bag: The destruction of Europe was plotted 17 years ago

The replacement of Europeans by non-European migrants was cooked up by an anti-Western UN 17 years ago.
Apparently, the declining birthrate of Europe is being used as an excellent cover for encouraging an increase in immigration so as to reverse Europe's decline due to a low birth rate. However the refugee crisis resulting from  the engineered unrest in the middle East has provided a perfect opportunity for a de facto hijrah into a very specifically targeted Europe, the U.S. and  economically successful Japan and South Korea. The document did conclude that it would not help America since it already had extensive immigration. Hmmmm, presently, that does not seem to be keeping keep it immune from being pressured into accepting its "fair quota" of refugees. 
It is utterly fascinating how non-communist and/or Western nations seem to be the target of a gradual non-military genocide as well as a cloaked confiscation of their wealth.
Obviously, the globalist elites have the perfect storm in which to achieve their dream of a one world government, or so they think. The values, inquiring minds, logic, and free thinking thought processes of Western Civilization must be eliminated in order to maintain control over a more compliant populace, which will eventually be living in a "Hunger Games" scenario. Mass migration is the perfect tool to bring the West to its knees and to eventually eliminate its culture.
The success of the elites' nefarious plot remains to be seen. Does the West have the will to survive and fight back for its own future?

The following excerpts from the article are not in order but pulled to emphasize just a few cogent and more frightening points.

Plot to replace Europeans with refugees exposed  
U.N. document reveals 2000 plan to push massive migration
by Liam Clancy
From Trump's speech in Poland:
“The fundamental question of our time is whether the West has the will to survive. Do we have the confidence in our values to defend them at any cost?” Trump asked. Do we have enough respect for our citizens to protect our borders? Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilization in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?”
Trump then emphasized: “We can have the largest economies and the most lethal weapons anywhere on Earth, but if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive.”...
...In 2007, at the fourth World Congress of Families, attended by 3,300 lawmakers and activists from 75 nations, Poland’s vice premier, Roman Giertych, warned of a coming “demographic winter.”
Returning to the centrality of marriage and families is the only way to avoid civilizational disaster, he insisted, declaring the family as “the hope for Poland, the hope for Europe, the hope for the entire world.”
“Without the family, there is no nation, there is no continent, there is no civilization, there is nothing,” he said.... (emphasis mine)
Just eight months before the congress, Mark Steyn, in his book “America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It,” warned that amid the shrinking of the European family, one of the fastest demographic evolutions in history already was making traditional views of European culture outdated.
He predicted Europe “will be semi-Islamic in its politico-culture character within a generation.”
While it takes a fertility rate of at least 2.1 children per woman for a nation to replenish itself, countries once known for big families, such as Greece and Spain, had fertility rates of 1.2 and 1.1 respectively at the time. The current rate in Greece may be as low as 1.1. Italy’s fertility rate is 1.4, while the country’s Muslim population has grown from about 2,000 in 1970 to 2 million today.
By 2050, Steyn wrote in September 2006, 60 percent of Italians, for example, will have no brothers, no sisters, cousins, no aunts, no uncles...
....The document – “Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Aging Populations?” – details the plunging birthrates across Europe and identifies a solution: mass immigration.

Thursday, July 20, 2017

IT'S JUST TOO MUCH TROUBLE


 by Robby Bowling
Many people make the claim they want to be "Informed" but is that actually true?  I myself have my doubts about that! I mean to say "Knowing Trivial Excrement" doesn't count...The world is already full of Walking Zombies, who think they think, but they haven't had an original "Thought" for Years, if ever! And it's one thing to be LAZY & APATHETIC but if you are "Programmed" to be an IDIOT, well you'll be an IDIOT without some kind of Intervention, divine or not!


Our daily habits & routines generally shed the Light on our Life, Goals & the things we Thirst & are Passionate about...I guess in the Beginning before there was "Written Words & Texts" there were "Storytellers" that would spin the yarns, fables, fairy tale's, rhymes & anecdotal stories....Next came the books & texts (with pictures) & later we discovered radio & television....And to Glean, Learn, Surmise, Absorb with the Goal being to "Understand" well that took Time, Will-Power & Concentration! SOMETHING that seems to have disappeared in  today's World,,,


Magicians & Cons learned a long time ago the "Art Of Deception" or "Slight Of Hand Tricks"...."Now You See It, Now You Don't!" I guess you could, in fact, say "Life is a Game" being Played on Stages everywhere & at different Levels...But it is not a "FUN GAME" it is in fact "Life & Death" but few will realize or acknowledge that fact....


From the Point of Creation forward to today, there has been an "Ongoing Battle" between "Right or Wrong" or "Good & Evil" if you prefer....That is a BATTLE that we seem to be Losing at badly...Most aren't even aware of what's going on around them...All they want is Shelter, Sex & Food...And they've been HERDED like Sheep by the Politicians, the Governments, the Media & Banks into a STATE of "Perpetual Ignorance!"  And I don't need to hear the CRAP, well not everyone is a "Brain-Washed Puppet" so what? The Numbers suggest we are "Out Numbered" ...not out matched, necessarily!

Wednesday, July 19, 2017

More ruthless inhumanity right up there with ISIS, and the world is largely uninformed

Decreed by the Government, no less!
Real ‘refugees’? White South Africans facing genocide
Puma ByDesign Race Relations, Wall of Shame, World

As not reported by the Communist media complex because they could care less, the victims are White South Africans, mostly farmers and as the world is pretends not to notice, White genocide is taking place in South Africa. The crimes are so horrific, the cries of the victims are so loud and blood curdling, HOW can world leaders not hear them? White South Africans are suffering. The families of White South Africans are being ripped apart and their livelihoods stolen as they are run off their land.
White South Africans cannot sleep at night for fear that they will be raped and slaughtered in their beds.
White South Africans are dying horrible deaths. They are the refugees that no one cares to discuss.
I often refer to the war against the Boer as a gift from Nelson Mandela. Mandela was a Marxist ideologue whose policies (if you could call it that) failed and were devastating to those who did not fall in line and to the White South African.
From  WND by Liam Clancy
Since the 1990s, between 2,000 and 4,000 farmers have been murdered.

Tuesday, July 18, 2017

THERE WAS A TIME

1263067_616728215037649_2011412247_o
by Robby Bowling
There was a TIME, apparently a long time ago when we believed in our "Principles" enough to "Make A Stand" & say enough...stop...Well, apparently those days are now being "Buried" in some "Time Vault" for some Future Generation of People to look at & question....This ERA of Ignorance, Permissiveness, Narcissism, Hedonism, Sadism & Provision will be LIKE all the rest...It will eventually DIE a slow agonizing Death just like all the others before them like "SODOM & GOMORRAH" or later "CALIGULA'S ROME!" The question is "How Many will DIE & SUFFER at their hands...I suspect "Thousands" will...And how do you Measure Suffering which may well be more painful than Death itself...


I think most of us "Grew up" in a world where we "Honestly Tried" to protect those who couldn't "Protect Themselves!" "Mostly I speak of Innocent Children! I know that we sometimes Failed, but t least we Tried...Not Trying is the Sin...My question is thus, have we "Arrived" at that "Point Of No Return" where NOTHING is out of Bounds or Taboo? Remember the old axiom, "When Is Enough, Enough?" Do we no longer have a "Belief System" (Flawed & All) to Start From & Fight For? It would seem so to me...Don't get me wrong I understand that there are still some who are like me "Repulsed" by today's World, but we don't have much "Sway" do we?


THERE WAS A TIME when we Tried to let Children be Children & go about their on way Playing, Laughing, Pretending, Questioning, Learning & Living at "Their Own Pace" to do it "Mostly" on their on...Granted we "Sat The Table" at which they ate, learned & grew, but we didn't "Force Feed Them The Garbage" like they're being fed today...Honestly while the "Age Of Consent" may have been "Arbitrary" at least we had an Idea...Now it seems there is "No Threshold" on anything...And I believe that is WRONG...
404152_457865707590568_1555887958_n

Monday, July 17, 2017

Tucker Carlson Blasts "Conservatism Inc."


Trump 'shocking, vulgar and right' – cat's out of bag
Tucker Carlson's assessment a devastating indictment of 'Conservatism, Inc.'
by Liam Clancy

WASHINGTON – In a prescient article written during President Trump’s campaign, then-Daily Caller editor Tucker Carlson declared that candidate Trump was “shocking, vulgar and right.”

Carlson placed the blame for the rise of the outsider squarely at the feet of the established conservative movement, often called ‘Conservatism Inc.”

That group, he suggested, created the conditions that led to Trump’s unexpected popularity.

Trump “exists because you failed,” Carlson declared to Conservatism Inc., blasting the huge network of nonprofits and organizations surrounding Washington for a complete lack of tangible success in recent decades.

“Consider the conservative nonprofit establishment, which seems to employ most right-of-center adults in Washington,” Carlson wrote. “Over the past 40 years, how much donated money have all those think tanks and foundations consumed? Billions, certainly.”

“Has America become more conservative over that same period? Come on. Most of that cash went to self-perpetuation: Salaries, bonuses, retirement funds, medical, dental, lunches, car services, leases on high-end office space, retreats in Mexico, more fundraising,” Carlson continued.

The United States of America is on the brink of total dissolution. And the conservative think tanks and foundations in Washington, D.C. are just another part of the problem. It’s time to charge the cockpit before it’s too late. It’s time for revolution. Learn the real story behind the intellectual and political movement which stunned the dishonest media – and put Donald J. Trump in the White House. THE blockbuster of 2017:

“Unless you were the direct beneficiary of any of that, you’d have to consider it wasted.”

Carlson further faulted the intellectuals and journalists who presumed to define conservatism for essentially shaming their own grassroots supporters for backing Trump.

Sunday, July 16, 2017

The Hive Mind: Programmed and Relentless



Written three years ago and continues to be spot on:
The following post discusses the three major points with a clarity that will enlighten those who marvel at the hatred  and venom spewed against the opposition, none of which has any basis in reality. The enumeration and further discussion of these points are halfway through the post but preceded by cogent observation.

Reason #1: Utopianism You’re in their way
Reason #2: Fantasyland vs. Reality The WORLD is in their way
Reason #3: Preening Narcissism They are beautiful, so you must be ugly

The Top Three Reasons Why Liberals Hate Conservatives

Posted: September 21, 2014 at 1:19 pm   /   by

“Conservatives see liberals as misguided; liberals see conservatives as evil.”
—Original source unknown


Are you a conservative, a libertarian, or a Republican? Have you ever been verbally assaulted by someone on the political left with a ferocity you didn’t quite understand? Have you seen it happen to friends and colleagues, or watched in horror as the media establishment does it to a public figure?
Of course you have. At some point or other, nearly everyone on the political right has witnessed or been the victim of an attack designed not to elucidate facts, but rather to paint him or her as a villain.
My attention was recently drawn to a typical such calumny from a Facebook exchange:
Republicans hate anything that isn’t white, wealthy, and christian at least in appearance. They hate the poor, women, and minorities. They hate science and don’t believe that the global warming we clearly are experiencing is man made. They hate any government programs that help the poor and minorities, and the (sic) particularly despise immigrants, particularly the illegal kind. They love programs that line the pockets of oil companies, mining companies, and are willing to export jobs with wild abandon.
They hate public education, and they despise public schools and the public school teachers and public university professors. And since the (sic) do not respect the market place of ideas, they hate tenure (that gives teachers academic freedom) because it prevents them from firing teachers who are Democrats and who might infect some student with their liberal ideas. They want insurance companies to make a maximum of profit, and are perfectly willing for the health insurance companies to kill people by refusing service to anyone that might cost them a buck more than the median expense. They don’t care about clean food because it might cost the food corporation a little money, and they don’t care about clean water because cleaning up the waste will cost their precious corporate persons a little money.
This is not a recitation of facts; it is a series of smears. It is the construction of a giant cartoonish super-villain, made of straw and woven together with calumny. The giant straw villain is then publicly burned, in a narcissistic orgy of self-adulation. Of course, the torches of the “best” people burn the brightest.
Another way of looking at it is this: It is the modern-day version of a witch trial. The charges are utterly farcical and cartoonish. “I saw her dancing with demons in the pale moonlight.” “She looked at me and I sneezed, and the next day, I had a terrible cold.” “She turned me into a newt.” But they are stated with great conviction and repeated incessantly, and they establish the unassailable collective will of which the accused has run afoul. The witch is made into the auslander, and the good people of the community show how “good” they are by shouting their accusations the loudest.
Either way, whether the wicker man or the witch, the effigy goes up in flames and the community is purged—for the moment—of its evil. Moral annulment now achieved, the villagers walk away feeling good about themselves. Feeling superior.
Facts are also unimportant in this perverse passion play. Like the slavering, semi-psychotic Facebook rant above, most such assaults aren’t a series of accusations backed up by facts, they are a series of character assassinations, most of which are contradicted by the facts.
The most salient example today is the charge that people of the right (conservatives, Republicans, libertarians, tea partiers) oppose Obama out of pure racism—simply because he is black. Though this charge is easily refuted—by common sense, widespread evidence, and actual studies—it is repeated incessantly by the media, the left’s foot-soldiers . . . even the president himself.
When actual studies are done (as opposed to just restating what the leftist imagines to be so as if it were actual fact), we learn that real racism is distributed fairly evenly among the population without regard to political affiliation.  In 2008, a survey was done that showed similar numbers of Republicans (5.7) and Democrats (6.8) would not vote for a black presidential candidate. Such a question gives us one of the clearest possible tests of raw racism. A loaded question like, “Do you feel blacks receive too much welfare?” might confuse attitudes about race with attitudes about government welfare programs. But this gives us apples to apples: All things being equal, would you refuse to vote for someone solely because of race?
In the 2008 survey, Democrats were slightly (1.1%) more likely to show racist thinking than Republicans, though this is well within the margin of error. A similar study on senatorial candidates was far more damning to Democrats. Bottom line: there is little evidence that Republicans oppose Obama or any candidate on the basis of race to any greater degree than Democrats.
But this should be obvious based on other facts and indicators as well. Take Mia Love. If you are on the political left, you may not have heard of her, but she is a rising star on the right. She quotes Bastiat, she believes in core principles such as subsidiarity—she is dynamic, successful, and hits all the right notes. She is a black woman, and I have not met or heard of a single conservative, Republican, or tea partier who wouldn’t be delighted to support her. (Deep down, many of the left know this, which is why they have been so vicious to her.) I have worked alongside or come in contact with hundreds of activists and partisans on the political right over the last 15 years, and I cannot think of a single one who would not exult at a Mia Love victory. If she were elected president, I myself would do the happy dance on top of the tallest mountain in my area every November!
The reason is obvious: we agree ideologically. Race is unimportant. Barack Obama is, it can be fairly argued, further to the political left than any previous president. And people on the right oppose him so virulently for that very reason—not because of his race, but because of the huge ideological gulf that lies between. Imagine that.
The other painfully incessant canard is the notion that people on the right “hate the poor.” In fact, the evidence shows the opposite. Conservatives are more charitable than liberals by fairly significant margins, even when you adjust for a variety of factors. Rich, middle-class, and poor conservatives are all more charitable than their liberal counterparts.  It’s not that conservatives are wealthier overall, either—liberal households are 6% wealthier on average. (I bet you never heard that little fact on MSNBC.) It is also not that conservatives are more religious: new data indicate that secular conservatives give more than secular liberals. These conservatives are voluntarily helping the poor with their own money, in greater numbers than their liberal counterparts in every cohort. Conservatism is a greater predictor of charity.
Leftists (they hardly deserve the term “liberal”), by contrast, are more “charitable” with other people’s money. Leftist A votes for Politician B to take money (by force) from Taxpayer C to give it to Recipient D. A and D give more support and power to B, who continues to take more and more from C, in a perverse and ever-increasing form of economic bondage. Then, A, B, and D get together and say that C hates the poor. Lather, rinse, repeat.

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Leftist Indoctrination in our public school system



Excellent article discussing indoctrination as opposed to education in our public schools.

Liberal Bias Starts Long Before College
Written by Maria Biery
There are too many examples of college campus craziness to count. There are entire websites—such as Campus Reform and The College Fix—that specialize in reporting the liberal bias, political correctness, and all around daily madness of institutions of higher education. However, for all the attention we give to these episodes at the collegiate level, we miss the root of the problem, and without addressing the cause we can’t hope for a solution.

The truth is, indoctrination of America’s youth begins long before college.
In my own experience, during my years at a public high school, I had a teacher who aired his left-leaning political views on a daily basis, during class hours, when we were supposed to be learning biology. I can remember sitting in the back of the class with my fists clenched asking myself, “What are we learning right now besides what he thinks about politics?” There was no space to debate him. Numerous students told their parents about it, but, at the end of the day, we all knew we couldn’t do anything. He was set to retire in a few years, he had tenure in the school district, and this was an AP class. No one was willing to risk their grade or their chances of getting into college over a forced hour and a half of frustration per day.

But the issues I had in the public school system extended far beyond this one teacher. It was frustrating that the only reason we learned certain things was so that we did well on statewide standardized tests. Every aspect of our education revolved around these tests. There was absolutely no room for critical thinking. Teachers would ask us, for example, what we thought about a Shakespeare play, and if we didn’t have the exact answer that they were looking for, crafted in the exact phrasing that was present on their curriculum guides, we were shot down.

This is problematic as we know that most teachers and educators, at all levels, lean left on the political spectrum, and if they are the ones making and teaching the curriculum we can rest assured that there will be some level of indoctrination and a lack of creative thinking.
This excerpt from a College Fix article on indoctrination in high school states the issue well:
It’s no surprise that a system that is state-funded and state-run advocates for a bigger government.The public school system is a microcosm of the socialist system, one that is bureaucratic, wasteful, and does not serve its original and intended purpose. Education is the cornerstone of Western society, a place where our youth are taught to think broadly and develop their own unique worldview. Instead, we are often taught what to believe instead of how to think. (emphasis mine)

Thursday, July 13, 2017

Eight reasons why Sharia endangers women: Do Westerners who are fine with Sharia fully understand it?


The following article is quite long but extremely informative with more links at the end. If one wants to know exactly where women stand under Sharia Law, this post will make it crystal clear and possibly give some information that the reader may not have already known.
Linda Sarsour and her ilk say that Sharia is misunderstood. If she and those like her truly believe that women are inferior, cannot make a move without their husbands' or male relatives' permission, deserve to be beaten and/or murdered for any immodest or immoral act, including being raped, then this mindset can be likened to "slave mentality". When people have it driven into their psyches that they are inferior and deserve any treatment given to them, many surrender to this belief. Others do not and are often met with a gruesome end.
There are those who advocate for the end of political and legalistic Islam, but although there may be a few twinkles of light here and there, Muslim women largely remain in the abyss of de facto bondage. The likes of Sarsour would gladly pull their Western sisters into the pit into which they themselves are dwelling. Or, perhaps Sarsour does not really know what she is talking about and needs to bone up on all aspects of Sharia herself.

Towards the end of the article is information regarding what the West must recognize and accept in order to prevent being placed under the yoke of Islamism and Sharia.

A Woman Under Sharia: 8 Reasons Why Islamic Law Endangers Women
An essential, scholarly comparison of the rights of women under Sharia and in the West.
BY Immanuel Al-Manteeqi
Women in the West are viewed as being equal to men from both an ontological and juridical perspective. Now, that is not to say that women have never been unjustly discriminated against in the West. On the contrary, it is a sad truth of history that throughout the centuries women in Western societies were often discriminated against.

Indeed, suffrage was only granted to American women in 1920, with the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment, which states that “the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.” But for at least the past few decades in the West, the predominant idea is that men and women are equal, and that women are entitled to the same basic rights that men enjoy.

Nowadays there are many principles that are enshrined in Western law to protect the rights of women. For example, in the West, the testimony of a woman is universally held—including in courts—to have the same value as the testimony of a man. Domestic violence against wives in the West is strictly prohibited, though unfortunately it is still practiced by some husbands. Furthermore, divorce is just as easy for a wife as it is for a husband to file for.

In addition, there is no discrimination against women when it comes to inheritance. Women are not disenfranchised of their fair share of inheritance just because they happen to be women. In the West women can also, for the most part, dress in any way that they desire without great social repercussions—and certainly not any legal repercussions.

The practice of polygamy is strictly prohibited in Western countries. The codification of monogamy into law goes at least as far back as Greco-Roman times. As a matter of fact, polygamy is seen in the West not only as an immoral practice but also as a practice that disenfranchises women. Moreover, Western countries take a strict stance on sexual exploitation and prohibit men from marrying or having sexual relations with pre-pubescent girls. And it goes without saying that Western countries strictly prohibit their soldiers from taking female sex slaves in times of war.

In sum, Western countries today treat women overall as equal to men, and there is no question that Western women enjoy individual freedoms. Western countries are the best places for women to live, where they can ascend to the highest seats of power in the land (think of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, UK Prime Minister Theresa May, and former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton) through democratic processes, and where this is no theoretical obstacle to female leaders.

1. Under Sharia, Wives Can Be Beaten. 

Blast from the past He's Baaaaack: Revisiting his "Accomplishments"


 

The following article speaks the truth and echos exactly what legions of Americans think.The nation had enough of and saw through the Hope and Change meme. Hillary lost, not only because she was a bad candidate, but because the non-elites, aka deplorables, did not want a continuation of the failed policies of the previous occupant of the Oval Office.
Yes indeed, he was a factor in her loss!


Obama's Ignominious Legacy
Preamble: The purpose of this blog is to highlight some of the most egregious goals and actions that underpin Obama's ignominious legacy and betrayal of America. They were malicious and intended to destroy America's well respected international standing as well as her traditions, culture and values. There is not a doubt in my mind that Obama is a radical black activist and most likely Muslim to whom America and Whites have always been anathema. The presidency provided him with the power to seek vengeance.

Smoke and Fire: The old adage, 'where there's smoke there's fire' is perfectly exemplified by Obama. He is a proven corrupt pathological liar who, among other things, has used multiple names, passports and social security numbers. Every meaningful record of his past has been permanently sealed and his birthplace is highly suspect. To be succinct, Obama is a fraud: He represents a catastrophic fire in America and a malignant cancer metastasizing through the civilized world.

Common Goal of U.S. Presidents: Throughout modern history, and most likely since Washington, I sincerely believe that every United States President loved America and endeavored to make her the greatest country the world had ever known. Their respective results notwithstanding, I am confident that each also wanted to leave America in a better place at the end of their term than when it began.

Regardless of party affiliation, these men were instrumental in enabling the creation of our great country as well as providing freedom and incredible opportunities for her citizenry. In part, their collective efforts facilitated a more peaceful world, as well as established America as an internationally recognized, trusted, and respected leader consistently representing a bastion of strength.

The Obama Years and Betrayal: Obama's tragic election commenced eight years of his relentless attempts to destroy America's long established greatness. I cannot think of one contribution he made to enhance America in the international community or to maintain her culture, traditions, values, and lives of the citizenry. To the contrary, Obama vowed to fundamentally transform America and every one of his actions was intended to militate against her best interests.

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Heartless, mocking Leftists jeer supporters of justice for Seth Rich

Vigil attendees gather outside the DNC headquarters in Washington, D.C., to honor murdered staffer Seth Rich on the anniversary of his death (Photo: Twitter)

Crowd chants 'Justice for Seth Rich!' outside DNC
Dems peer through windows, laugh at questions about slain staffer: 'You guys are pathetic'

By Alicia Powe and Chelsea Schilling
WASHINGTON – On the one-year anniversary of the murder of Seth Rich, dozens of concerned Americans gathered outside the Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., to honor the DNC staffer’s memory and demand answers from top Democrats about the mysterious slaying.

But Democrats laughed Monday as they passed the crowd of at least 30 people who held a silent vigil and later chanted, “Justice for Seth Rich!”

Ralliers held up stuffed panda bears in memory of Rich, who reportedly used the pseudonym “Panda” online. They also held signs demanding to see Rich’s death certificate and unreleased body-camera footage obtained by Metropolitan Police Department officers at the scene of the murder.

As WND has reported, Rich, the DNC’s 27-year-old voter expansion data director, had accepted a position with Hillary Clinton’s campaign just before his death. He was murdered in Washington, D.C., near his apartment in an affluent neighborhood. Rich was shot twice in the back with a handgun, and his wallet, credit cards, watch and phone were left in his possession. The Metropolitan Police Department has described the murder as a “botched robbery.” No suspects have been named, and no one has been arrested.

Private investigators have claimed there is evidence Rich was the source WikiLeaks used to obtain thousands of DNC emails released on the eve of the party’s presidential nominating convention last July. The emails, indicating the party was manipulating the primary race in favor of Hillary Clinton, led to the resignation of former DNC Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz. On July 22, just 12 days after Rich’s death and days before the Democratic Party Convention in Philadelphia, WikiLeaks released 20,000 DNC emails.