The Realistic Observer Archives

William Binny As usual the bought and paid for lapdog MSM & previous administration ignored these findings because they would have wrecked the very foundation of the Russiagate narrative. NSA Officials and Computer Expert: Forensic Evidence Proves DNC Emails Were LEAKED, Not Hacked Preface by Washington's Blog: We asked top NSA whistleblower Bill Binney what he thought about a report claiming that the DNC emails were transferred too quickly to have been accessed by a hacker, and could only have been copied by a DNC leaker. This article is his response.   Background here and here. MEMORANDUM FOR: The President FROM: Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) SUBJECT : Was the “Russian Hack” an Inside Job? Executive Summary Forensic studies of “Russian hacking” into Democratic National Committee computers last year reveal that on July 5, 2016, data was leaked (not hacked) by a person with physical access to DNC computers, and then doctor...

Was it a disgusted DNC insider who leaked material to Wikileaks as both Assange and former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray, attested: Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.” “I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things. “If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States. “America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.” What to believe? All we can do is try to get some facts, watch events, and make our own conclusions: For the latest, we have this: T...

Wikileaks' Julian Assange It appears as though Hillary has made a very powerful enemy in Putin and the question becomes: should she be elected president what will the nature of American/Russian relationships come to. If he truly has the goods on her, he can cost her the election. Worse should she be elected, he can blackmail her.  For Hillary, either way, the chickens have come home to roost. For America, disaster can be avoided only if she can be defeated. That assumes that Putin has nothing on Trump. Some Background From Politico's Michael Crowley and Julia Ioffe When mass protests against Russian President Vladimir Putin erupted in Moscow in December 2011, Putin made clear who he thought was really behind them: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. With the protesters accusing Putin of having rigged recent elections, the Russian leader pointed an angry finger at Clinton, who had issued a statement sharply critical of the voting results. “She said they were ...