In case you missed this: more nuggets on the FBI

WSJ drops truth bomb! FBI collusion as agency America “interfered in a presidential election”
More troubling evidence of election meddling at the bureau…
Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation is unravelling at record speed, with mass corruption, partisanship, and vitriol hate for Trump discovered among Mueller’s top agents and investigators.
This has prompted the The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board to post an article entitled, “The FBI’s Trump ‘Insurance’”, which outlines how the real election collusion had nothing to do with Russia and everything to do with the FBI.

As The Duran noted yesterday, these are the very same FBI agents who assured all of America that Russia “meddled” in the US election.
We are to believe that the FBI did not doctor evidence when it made the claims that it was confident” Russia hacked the US election? continue

FBI exposed as an Obama-esque “KGB” operation to bring down America – time to disband the bureau?
Posted by JD Heyes(Natural News) Over the summer we began to hear reports of anti-Trump malfeasance involving agents and officials with the FBI and Department of Justice, the agency to which the FBI answers. In recent weeks, reports have intensified and in recent days hard evidence has emerged proving, beyond a doubt, that the FBI was overtly politicized and used by former President Barack Obama against his political enemies.
Tens of millions of Americans are dumbfounded after learning just how corrupt the FBI, especially, has become. The final straw for many was a report earlier this week that noted counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok cryptically discussed an “insurance policy” with FBI lawyer Lisa Page in a text message that also implicated current bureau deputy director Andrew McCabe.
“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk,” Strzok wrote to Page, a reference to an “insurance policy” against a Trump victory.
Andy is believed to be McCabe.
“It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40,” Strzok added.
On Wednesday, during a House Judiciary Committee hearing featuring Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio blasted the DoJ official over that text message alone.
“This is unbelievable,” he said. “I think the public trust in this whole thing is gone.”
Later during an appearance with Lou Dobbs on Fox News, Jordan dropped another bombshell: He said he believes that text and other actions documented over the course of the past year prove once and for all that the FBI worked against the Republican Party during the 2016 presidential election cycle.
“Listen you can’t make this stuff up. It gets worse each and every day,” Jordan told Dobbs.“What deep down scares me, if this actually happened the FBI had a concerted effort with the people at the top to go after one party’s nominee to help the other party’s nominee,” he continued. original post
Read more of J.D. Heyes’ work at The National Sentinel.
Sources include:
FrontpageMag.com
TheNationalSentinel.com

The New FBI Agency Everyone Forgot – Did Adam Schiff Just Get Caught in an Elaborate Counterintelligence Sting?…
Posted by sundance
By now everyone is likely aware of the Fake News story run by CNN on Friday surrounding an email received by Donald Trump Jr.  The email was part of the investigative evidence shared with the House Intelligence committee; and later leaked from within that committee to CNN – thereby initiating the false reporting on the content.

The central issue in the CNN story was the date of an email.
It was leaked from within the committee, and later reported by CNN, that the date was “September 4th, 2016”; a date convenient for a collusion narrative between Trump Jr and WikiLeaks.
However, the real date, on the actual email, was “September 14th, 2016”; a day after Wikileaks published the content of their DNC leaks and a date that makes the entire CNN report a ‘nothingburger’.
However, CNN reports that two independent sources originally leaked to them the contents of what they had seen on the email in question.  But CNN never saw the email, until later in the day.
Think about this carefully.
♦Two “independent sources” both looked at an email, and both came away from reading that email with the wrong date?   How is that possible? entire post

Knowledge Is Power: The Realistic Observer is a non-profit blog dedicated to bringing as much truth as possible to the readers.corruption