The November People's Revolution vs The Current Elitist Counter Revolution
There are many web links questioning Trump's sanity. This is but one New bill would require Trump’s White House to hire a psychiatrist/ Sheer Democrat desperation bordering on insanity.
Elites Declare War Against The People Using Soros Funded Useful Idiots as Troops
The trendy wealthy elites are the drivers of the "protests" and violence this nation is now experiencing. Sugar daddy Soros continues his funding not only in America, but in Europe as well. He will not stop until he is either arrested or runs out of money, the latter of which is doubtful.
All pretense of civility and rational discussion flew out of the window upon Trump's victory. The privileged classes, blinded by their own arrogance, simply did not/could not see it coming. After all, they know what is best for the masses. Obviously, the lumpenproletariate were much more savvy than perceived by their "superiors". The enraged aristocracy is now in a fight for its life and will stop and nothing to regain its power.
In the events leading up to the 2016 election, there are a few similarities between the rise of the American masses against the globalist elites and of the circumstances leading to the French Revolution. The big difference is that the victory of our "third estate" has not resulted in the dragging of the elites to the guillotine. However, the uprooted aristocracy is desperately try to find a way to drag the masses to a figurative (so far) mass execution. The upended powers that be will employ clueless useful idiots to do their dirty work. If the counter revolution succeeds, and heaven forbid, should the deluded foot soldiers wake up, they too will be sent to the firing squads because their usefulness has ended.
Continual awareness of the drive for insurrection fueled by the elites is mandatory. This movement is not just a bunch of "sore losers" refusing to accept defeat and throwing temper tantrums. The enemy within is well funded, deadly, resolute and has many fronts.
For example:
Developments on college campuses may very well evolve from insults, violence, and williy nilly attacking of Trump supporters to honing actual combat skills.
A group at the University of Central Florida called the “Knights for Socialism” claims it’s training students in self-defense but the optics tell a different story.:
Leftist Fight Club’ trains UCF students to fight Republicans
The “Knights for Socialism” group at the University of Central Florida (UCF) held a workshop Sunday to teach left-wing students how to “BASH THE FASH” with a “Leftist Fight Club” open to everyone but Republicans.
“In response to the record number of hate crimes against Latinxs, Immigrants, Muslims, Women, the LGBTQIA+ community, Jews, African Americans and other minorities since the rise of Donald Trump and other Alt-Right Neo-Nazis, Knights for Socialism has decided to host a series of self-defense clinics for anyone that wants to learn how to BASH THE FASH,” asserts the Facebook event page for “Leftist Fight Club: The Rumbles at Lake Claire.”
The description explains that a local amateur boxer was on hand to teach basic hand-to-hand combat techniques at the self-defense clinic, in order to help the socialist students better protect themselves from potential hate crimes performed by those sympathetic to “Donald Trump and other Alt-Right Neo-Nazis.”
After the instruction, students were given the opportunity to practice what they learned by sparring with one another.
The event planners specifically urged women to attend because they expect a rise in sexual violence due to the election of President Trump. Source
And this:
Berkeley Student Newspaper Publishes Essays Defending Violence
Reporter and illustrator Desmond Meagley claims in another op-ed that the violence was necessary to prevent Milo from instigating violence against students on Berkeley’s campus. “There was no easy way to shut down the event and keep Yiannopoulos and his fans from inciting violence,” he insists. Milo’s ideas, he claims, are their own unique form of violence: “The violence that forms the foundation of Yiannopoulos’ ideology is far worse than any tactic the black bloc uses.”
Lest any readers object to the viewpoints above, Berkeley alumna Nisa Dang warns them to “check” their “privilege.” She argues that “no protest is nonviolent.” Students were “compelled” to protest violently, she says, because Milo’s words make students feel unsafe, and therefore call for pre-emptive action: “If I know that you are planning to attack me, I’ll do all I can to throw the first punch.” Adding that “police are violent agents of the state,” she claims that their very presence — limited as it was at the Milo event — “creates an atmosphere that perpetuates violence on community members.” She then mocks Milo for not facing whatever violence the rioters had in store — “To Milo: I’m sorry that you were too scared to stand your ground” — and hints that he ought to be murdered by those who survived genocides by “killing Nazis and people just like them.” Source
The elitist cry “We deserve to be in in charge"
"It's hard to imagine a clearer contrast between coastal elites and the heartland, and between the new economy and the old. On the one side are the glittering cities where workforces of minorities and immigrants do the dirty work behind the slick logos and buzzwords of the new economy. On the other are Rust Belt communities and Southern towns where working people actually used to make things.....
Somewhere along the way the political projects of the left ceased to be revolutionary. The left won. It took control of nations and set about dismantling them. Its social and economic agendas became law. It ruled through a vast interconnected system of bureaucracy, media, academia, non-profits and corporations. In Europe, democracy nearly vanished. In America, there were still elections, but they didn't matter very much. A Republican president could tinker a little, but he couldn't change things. The left would throw its ritualistic tantrums if he limited abortion funding or invaded Iraq. But around the isolated controversies, everything else would go on moving further to the left.
The left had come to envision its victory as inevitable. Its leaders enjoyed a secular right of kings bestowed on them by historical materialism. And so they couldn't see the revolution coming.
The inevitable elites and their power were overthrown. The little people they had been stepping on stormed the castle. All their pseudoscience polls had failed to predict it. Suddenly the future no longer belonged to the City or to Palo Alto. And its denizens poured out into the streets to protest.
The protests are taking place in the name of oppressed minorities, but like any dot com logo, that's branding. They are actually an angry reaction by an overthrown elite to a people's revolution.: Source
In addition to organized "demonstrations" and college student protests" The Democrats are resorting to their old tricks of sabotaging the entire electoral process by building massive networks to combat voter ID laws the basis of which is insulting and derogatory to those who are the targeted alleged beneficiaries.
"Additionally, Ellen Kurz, the president of iVote, a group formed in 2014 to "secure voting rights" for all Americans, will sit on Let America Vote's advisor board. In return, Kander will join the board of iVote.
Logan Churchwell, the spokesperson for the Public Interest Legal Foundation, a legal group that fights for election integrity through litigation efforts, told the Washington Free Beacon that the term "nonprofit" is too generous of a term for Let America Vote and that the group is "a super PAC through and through."
Churchwell then referred to the ramped up efforts against voter laws as "soft bigotry" from Democrats.
"For years, opponents of election integrity reforms have advertised to march under the banner of protecting civil rights, while arguing that voter ID laws are harmful because black voters aren't ‘sophisticated' enough to follow the rules," Churchwell said. "The soft bigotry of low expectations has predictably resulted in a backlash, leading to polling demonstrating that between 70 and 80 percent of Americans support voter ID. As a point of fact, voter ID tends to be more popular among the poorer, lesser educated, older, and minorities in general. All that remain are wealthier, white liberals. No wonder the ‘advisory board' is 63 percent white." Source
As we all know, the leftist fight against the second amendment is not just about gun control in order to reduce crime. It is but the first step toward a final globalist victory against ordinary, freedom loving human beings. Let all patriots pray that it does not come to this, but if it does, we must be prepared.
Also, we must keep in mind that though they probably would have lost in the end, the Spartans were ultimately betrayed by an enemy within which hastened their defeat. Beware.
Knowledge is power. The Realistic Observer is a non-partisan, non-profit blog dedicated to keeping our readers as informed as possible.
Comments
Post a Comment