The Patriots Daily Bites of American Reformation History Series 15, Volume 3:Federal Judiciary “An irresponsible body”
THE COUNTRY
THE PATRIOT
THE HISTORY
THE HISTORY
PEARL LEONA STURGIS·SATURDAY, MARCH 12, 2016
The Patriots Daily Bites of American Reformation History Series 15, Volume 3
Declaration of Restoration February 14, 2014
Declaration of Restoration February 14, 2014 We The People of the United States of America, seeking the assistance of our Creator, do declare that we have sinned against heaven and neglected our duty to remain vigilant in the defense of our liberties and the Rights he has bestowed upon us. We humbly beseech you for forgiveness for our neglect and ask for guidance and wisdom as we seek to restore what we’ve allowed to be usurped.
This is part of the Restoration Declaration.... For decades the Republic was plundered by the imposition of the Income Tax… the deadline of this tyrannical tax was April 15th. Therefore, as an act of defiance to the globalist bankers whose greed and lust for power has brought the American economy to its knees, it is our intent to begin the implementation of the plan to restore lawful government as of that day… turning it from a day of infamy to the second Independence Day!
Since the Federal Government prevented the legitimate secession of the Confederate States of America from the Union by force, it has exercised dominance over those States as well as the other States of the Union in contravention of the Constitution that formed, defines the powers of, and limits it. At the conclusion of that conflict, the former States of Confederacy were placed under Federal occupation and required to ratify amendments as a condition of regaining their seats in Congress; such coercion falls under the principle of duress and cannot be construed to be the act of freewill… making all such amendments void and not a part of the Constitution.
To remove the usurpation, fraud, and deceit perpetrated against the limitations of the Constitution and restore our limited constitutional government, we hereby seek the restoration of our Constitution as of January 1, 1860, before the commencement of hostilities of the civil war; the Constitution at this time included the original 13th Amendment. This is not to be construed as the reinstitution of slavery and Congress is urged to propose Amendments to remove all language regarding that institution once the Republic and State representation in the Senate has been restored.5 minutes ago · Unlike ·
1 It is hereby recognized as well that the opinions of the Supreme Court do not affect the laws or powers of any State but only the litigants in the particular case before the Court. Furthermore, only expressed powers are applicable in deciding cases before the Court, not “implied powers”, “public policy”, or the “public good;” the Constitution is to be enforced literally, as written; nor is the Supreme Court to acknowledge either International law nor laws of any other country or organization superior to the Constitution when deciding any case before it. Support for anything in contravention of the Constitution by any judge or Justice is cause for immediate dismissal from the bench; such support expressed from the bench shall be construed as a confession in open court.
1 It is hereby recognized as well that the opinions of the Supreme Court do not affect the laws or powers of any State but only the litigants in the particular case before the Court. Furthermore, only expressed powers are applicable in deciding cases before the Court, not “implied powers”, “public policy”, or the “public good;” the Constitution is to be enforced literally, as written; nor is the Supreme Court to acknowledge either International law nor laws of any other country or organization superior to the Constitution when deciding any case before it. Support for anything in contravention of the Constitution by any judge or Justice is cause for immediate dismissal from the bench; such support expressed from the bench shall be construed as a confession in open court.
Proposal for either an amendment to the Federal Constitution or a Federal statute as the restored Congress determines appropriate.
Anyone who has taken the oath of office is obligated to the duties described therein. Every officer that has violated the terms of their oath, as evidenced by their actions recorded in the public record, is subject to removal from office by any officer aware of the evidence of such usurpation regardless of rank or title. The term of office of anyone violating their oath shall expire as of the commission of the violation.
All officers, before taking the oath of office shall be required to take a competency examination on the text of the Constitution(s), including all amendments attached thereto; they shall also be informed of their duty to immediately remove or cause to be removed anyone guilty of violating their oath regardless of rank or office. PL Sturgis...I found this Declaration of second Independence on facebook. It was sent to me by a disabled veteran and I do not know who wrote it but I do know it matches with the 5 reference Public School Books I have been researching dated 1885 to 1956. The truth does not change.
This is absolutely flabbergasting as it says the same thing in the 1885 Public School book which wasn't more than a decade or 2 from the passing of the 14th amendment. I would think it has to be true because these men were there at the time and it has been deliberately hidden from us.
I did not know about the Protestant reformation till I was 53 years old. I'll have to give you my testimony of that some time. That is shocking also.
“The Federal Judiciary, an irresponsible body, is governing a little today and a little tomorrow to place the people under the despotism of an oligarchy.” The Court has evolved to this very state today. Edwin C. Corwin in the Constitution of United States describes four distinct stages in the history of the Supreme Court.
1) From 1800 to 1835, he calls the era of national supremacy.
2) Then from 1835 to 1895, he calls the era of Constitutional supremacy. This era was generally good.
3) But then from 1895 to 1950 was the age of Judicial supremacy, in which the decisions of the court were no longer just the interpretation of the laws; But considered THE LAW OF THE LAND IN PLACE OF THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF! In the words of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, in 1907: “THE CONSTITUTION IS WHAT THE JUDGES SAY IT IS!”
4) Finally, Edwin Corwin describes our present era as one of “JUDICIAL LEGISLATION!” Today the Court no longer limits itself to settling disputes among parties but it STRIKES DOWN LAWS IN ALL 50 STATES! IT ISSUES RESTRAINING ORDERS THAT USURPS BOTH LEGISLATION AND EXECUTIVE POWERS!
Pearl’s Poem:
We’re living in the days of Lot...where evil reigns and good does not. Where hate and ridicule is strong for those who try to right the wrong.; where even brothers are condemned; we judge the ones who judge the sin! We say, “Keep silence in the Gate! Let evil forces dominate!” We’re living in these trying times, forgiving high and treasonous crimes! Yes, we live in the Days of Lot. where evil reigns and good does not...BUT RIGHTEOUSNESS EXALTS THE LAND AND JUST MEN FALL BUT RISE AGAIN!
Federal Judiciary: “An irresponsible body”
Providential History Belisle and McDowell 1996:
Jefferson’s Quote:
“The Federal Judiciary, an irresponsible body, is governing a little today and a little tomorrow to place the people under the despotism of an oligarchy.” The Court has evolved to this very state today. Edwin C. Corwin in the Constitution of United States describes four distinct stages in the history of the Supreme Court.
1) From 1800 to 1835, he calls the era of national supremacy.
2) Then from 1835 to 1895, he calls the era of Constitutional supremacy. This era was generally good.
3) But then from 1895 to 1950 was the age of Judicial supremacy, in which the decisions of the court were no longer just the interpretation of the laws; But considered THE LAW OF THE LAND IN PLACE OF THE CONSTITUTION ITSELF! In the words of Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, in 1907: “THE CONSTITUTION IS WHAT THE JUDGES SAY IT IS!”
4) Finally, Edwin Corwin describes our present era as one of “JUDICIAL LEGISLATION!” Today the Court no longer limits itself to settling disputes among parties but it STRIKES DOWN LAWS IN ALL 50 STATES! IT ISSUES RESTRAINING ORDERS THAT USURPS BOTH LEGISLATION AND EXECUTIVE POWERS!
Pearl’s Poem:
Days of Lot:
We’re living in the days of Lot...where evil reigns and good does not. Where hate and ridicule is strong for those who try to right the wrong.; where even brothers are condemned; we judge the ones who judge the sin! We say, “Keep silence in the Gate! Let evil forces dominate!” We’re living in these trying times, forgiving high and treasonous crimes! Yes, we live in the Days of Lot. where evil reigns and good does not...BUT RIGHTEOUSNESS EXALTS THE LAND AND JUST MEN FALL BUT RISE AGAIN!
The Warren Court that struck down prayer.
In case You Missed our American History Series On (American Revolution )
The Great Awakening
In case You Missed our Constitution series or just want to Refresher ,we have the complete series below.
There is Nothing Wrong with the Constitution it's the people we elected to uphold their oaths ,That are the Problems .
This my friends is where all our hopes and dreams ,Freedoms ,Liberties were formed some 240 years ago ,by a group of men with foresight to see way down the road for what is today. The Greatest Country in the World,And Still Is,as long as WE THE PEOPLE STAND UP FOR OUR FREEDOMS
Don't forget to follow The Realistic Observer on Facebook and our Page also Pinterest , Twitter. PLEASE help spread the word by sharing our articles on you
Comments
Post a Comment